Singularity
This is our first blog. So, let's start with some basics. Because, why not? So, here we go...
Mathematics defines a singularity as a point where a given
mathematical object such as a function is not defined. The function reaches an
undefined value such as infinity or is non-differentiable at the point.
There might be one of these two possibilities: Either
mathematics is not describing reality if we look too closely or, we may claim
the reality in actuality has infinities!
Let us try to understand the probability of the existence of
these singularities from some examples and physical equations.
Let us take the case of a vortex flow, the velocity of fluid
particles spinning in the whirlpool is inversely proportional to the distance
of fluid particles from the centre of the vortex. As the fluid reaches the
centre of the vortex (or its radius
approaches zero) its velocity approaches infinity. At a radius equal to zero
or at the centre of the vortex an infinite velocity is expected. But in actual
this phenomenon is restricted by many factors.
Like the size of water molecules (2.75
angstroms), repulsion between atoms, electrons etc. Thus, the infinite
velocity is not reached and singularity (at
r = 0) does not exist in this example, as proposed by the mathematical
equation.
A vortex |
Let us take another example.
Suppose, we are walking on the equator at such a speed that we
can cross all the time zones in a 24-hour span. We would complete a full circle
of the earth in 24 hours. Now, if we move northwards, say near the north pole, at
60 degrees latitude, and move with the same speed, we would cross all the time zones
twice in the same 24-hour span. At a latitude of 89.4 degrees this count
increases to 100. As we get closer to the north pole, the number of times we
cross the time zones at the same speed and same time interval increases
steeply. At the north pole, as we all know all the time zones intersect at a point,
the no. of times we cross the time zones reaches infinity, whatever that may
mean.
But if instead of seeing these time zones on a globe, we use
a map; we will see these time zones as parallel non-intersecting lines with no
singularity. Thus, singularity is removed by a mere change of coordinates.
This type of singularity is called co-ordinate singularity, i.e., a mere change
in co-ordinates can bring or remove a singularity.
An artist's hilarious depiction of co-ordinate singularity |
Let's take the example of something all of us are most interested in - The case of Gravitational Singularity!
If we take Newton’s laws of gravitation, we
see that the gravitational force between two bodies is inversely proportional
to the square of the distance between them. When the two bodies approach each
other, the gravitational force between them increases. For a finite body, the
whole mass can be supposed to be concentrated at the centre of gravity. When we
reach that point, we are most probably inside the body and all the mass is over
us. But, what if the whole mass was concentrated on one point?
The point would have infinite density and a point near to
that would experience infinite gravitational pull. This infinite force would
lead to infinite acceleration, thus, breaking the laws of physics. This point is
the gravitational singularity!
Artist's rendering of a black hole sucking matter from a blue giant companion star. |
Thus, we can define gravitational singularity as a point where infinite density develops as infinite space-time approaches it. This was the case with Newton’s law of Gravitation! But, as we know, Newton’s law of Gravitation is actually not that universal and it gives wrong answers where the gravitational pull is too strong, like near a star or a black hole. But what happens when we take into consideration the General Theory of Relativity?
Actually, it gives even more singularities!
For understanding this we need some high-level mathematics which is outside the scope of this blog. We use Schwarzschild Metric. This is obtained when we solve Einstein field equations for the simple case of a spherically symmetric mass in an empty universe. When we simplify it to allow movements towards or away from a massive object, this equation reduces to
So, I would leave this topic here only, for now. Hope it was
useful and you liked and enjoyed reading it. Will see you soon. Till then, bye.
We are Oblivious to the true nature of universe, axioms on which our maths is based could be reason for these indefinite singularity.
ReplyDeleteOf course, yes. The prediction of singularity by a theory shows its failure at that point. Physicists get the hint that theory is incomplete and needs correction. In this article I have talked about the possibilities of the very existence of singularity and how a singularity indicated by a theory usually doesn't exist in real life.
Delete